Comments on: No pixels were harmed in the making of this Picture :) http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture Photographer | Retoucher | Trainer | Photoshop World Instructor based in the UK Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:58:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: David Asch http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6961 David Asch Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:50:46 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6961 I much prefer the desaturated version. The subtle colours define him more.

]]> By: Tim Pursall http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6959 Tim Pursall Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:59:30 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6959 I’m plumping for the desaturated version Glyn. Subtle but very effective. Great work!

I still chuckle to myself at the comments Mr Kelby made to Shaun when he appeared on stage at his recent LISIRI seminar!

Best wishes

Tim Pursall

]]> By: Adrian http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6958 Adrian Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:04:50 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6958 Desaturated version

]]> By: DaveT http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6957 DaveT Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:19:13 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6957 From these two – the desaturated version. It also lends itself to more options with coloured text.

As much as I am a fan of B&W, this particular version hasn’t, for me, got enough oooomph! (technical description for plenty of deep black and contrasting white).

Really looking forward to the follow up post on how it was all put together Glyn.

Have a great workshop!!

Dave

]]> By: Stuart Cosgrave http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6954 Stuart Cosgrave Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:46:31 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6954 Glyn – Desat all the way for me, I like a bit of colour coming out from the track and cloud, but both very cool. Cracking work on these! Stu

]]> By: Torsten http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6953 Torsten Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:51:43 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6953 Not an easy decision, but in the end I’d opt for the b/w version. It has a more stylish approach, although the desaturated version is pretty close on it’s heels too.

Cheers,

Torsten

]]> By: Denis Van Linden http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6952 Denis Van Linden Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:25:51 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6952 Desaturated version for me to, looks much beter.

]]> By: David Kelly http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6951 David Kelly Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:51:57 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6951 Desaturated version for me. The cloudscape on the mono conversion looks to flat whereas it has better contrast in the desaturated version.

]]> By: Gunther Frans http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6950 Gunther Frans Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:33:12 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6950 For me without a doubt the desaturated one. The black and white is for me personally a bit too flat, as in, too little constrast model vs background.

]]> By: Olivier http://glyndewis.com/2012/07/20/no-pixels-were-harmed-in-the-making-of-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-6949 Olivier Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:29:52 +0000 http://glyndewis.com/?p=11273#comment-6949 The desaturated version, picture got more depth.

]]>